There are worms,
and there are wyrms. One is small, weak-bodied
and blind. The other is a wily and fearsome beast, the ultimate opponent. The
two words have wildly opposite meanings – or do they?
What do I mean? Both worm and wyrm share a common characteristic – that of snake-ness. The snake-ness of each word is vastly different, and yet, the ‘thingness’
of snake is such a powerful concept,
that it embeds itself solidly into our conceptual maps at an early age. And there
it stays.
Proof? Take a look at YouTube. There are dozens of videos of adorable toddlers finding ‘snakes’ – invariably earthworms (or similar). The worm is what is most commonly experienced, and yet snake is the concept that has already lodged foremost in the child’s mind.
Ask yourself this: how is it that we all know what a dinosaur is, when that ‘thing’ ceased to
exist millennia ago? How is it that we know what a dragon is, when that ‘thing’ never existed at all? It’s because they
are powerful concepts that we learn early, and then draw upon throughout our
lives.
It’s a bit like that trick, where you get someone to do some maths, and then you ask them to say an animal or a vegetable. They always say elephant or carrot. It’s because the unique ‘thingness’ of elephants and carrots develops in our conceptual frameworks early in our childhood. And it stays there, as a central, quickly accessed mental construct.
In this way, the thingness of the worm and the wyrm are
meshed together conceptually. It’s the snake-ness
of them that has informed the evolution of the words from the worm-like, through the snake-like, to the dragon-like. Not only that,
it has occurred simultaneously across cultures, as both the language and the
mythology of wyrm and dragon have evolved in different places over
thousands of years.
The earliest representations of wyrms/dragons were largely
serpent-like in nature, and then later evolved into reptilian creatures with
legs and wings. According to my (not fact-checked) internet research, the Greek
source word for dragon (drákōn) is
related to the word for eye, and in
early legends, the dragon was very much a watcher and guardian of treasure. There’s
a nice, unblinking snake-ness in that
idea. Because snakes don’t blink. They have a clear scale over their eyes that
gives them their unnerving, glassy stare.
In one Greek legend, the dragon Ladon lies entwined in a
serpentine manner around a tree in the Garden of the Hesperides, guarding the
Golden Apples of immortality. It reminds
me of another story that involves a tree and a serpent and some divine apples
that the humans aren’t supposed to eat. (Please
tell me I’m not the only person who has noticed this similarity. And yet, on
this topic, the internet is strangely quiet). In these stories, we find more
of those powerful early-formed ideas: the garden, the tree – and the apple. The simple apple
invokes youth, health, sweetness, ripeness, temptation, desire, reward, favour –
so much more than just fruit.
The ‘thingness’ of these words is meshed so deeply in our mental
constructs that they exist way down near the bedrock of our consciousness.
These aren’t just things, they are
primal, powerful symbols. And if you put
them in your writing, that’s the part of your reader’s mind that they will
speak to. This is where the power of metaphor
and symbol comes from.
Sure, lizards and apricots could be effective in your story,
if used well. But if you use more fundamental images like snakes and apples, even with the lightest of touches, you
will invoke a much richer set of mental associations, and engage the reader’s
whole mind.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Your witty, insightful and encouraging comments welcome!